PHOTO SUPREME MANUAL MANUAL
My suggestion: buy IMatch, integrate with free Azure or Google Cloud Vision plan… use the Autotagger app in manual verification mode. Fingers crossed for the next version!įor every 5 useful keywords, they put 5 wrong or awkward ones.Įnd result: these type of applications are not saving you anytime, they actually cost you time since you have to check and verify everything. But other features are quite disappointing, I’d say it is barely usable as DAM as is. OMG just tried it out… I’m blown away by the AI tagging, it is seriously accurate and puts 4-6 useful tags on each picture. Likewise Pixelmator Photo’s ML adjustments are a useful addition but you also have full manual control of everything ML can touch. AI features can materially add to the appeal of a product, but pinning everything to the AI banner is, in my view, a quick road to oblivion.Īn example of good AI use is Pixelmator Pro’s AI Super Resolution which does an incredible job of upscaling images, but that is one feature in a very well rounded application. Sadly, the AI seems to be their focus and I find this regrettable. For my own purposes, I do not expect to still be alive when AI can do automatically what I do with keywords today, even at 50% accuracy. I did this once and actually laughed out loud.Īs I stated in their forum, AI won’t be of practical use until it’s something like 90% accurate and that is many years off yet. Pick a photo that impresses you with its classification, then click the magnifying glass. The real test is Excire’s “find similar” function. So most of the shots I checked that had “parrot” did have a parrot in them, but not all parrot shots were classified thus.
picking out parrots from other birds, but as ever with AI there were plenty of classifications that were not made. I was impressed with some of the classifications it made, e.g.
The AI tagging is the best I have seen, which is to say impressive but ultimately not incredibly useful.
0 kommentar(er)
